If a stop has an invalid geocode score or no geocode information, which ITQA process will be required?

If a stop has an invalid geocode score or no geocode information, which ITQA process will be required?

• A. automatic correction
• B. batch update
• C. manual plot
• D. geocode re-run

Answer: (C)

When geocoding data isn’t usable, a human must step in to place the stop where it belongs. If a stop has an invalid geocode score or no geocode information, automated processes can’t confidently map it, so the correct ITQA action is manual plot. A user can place the stop on the map using the known address, nearby landmarks, or precise coordinates, ensuring an accurate location for routing and analysis. Automatic correction isn’t reliable here because there’s no trustworthy data to fix, and you’d risk misplacing the stop. A batch update isn’t appropriate for a single ambiguous case and wouldn’t resolve the location issue on its own. Re-running geocoding could work if the underlying data is viable, but with an invalid or missing geocode, it may fail again; manual plotting directly provides a correct, verifiable position.

When geocoding data isn’t usable, a human must step in to place the stop where it belongs. If a stop has an invalid geocode score or no geocode information, automated processes can’t confidently map it, so the correct ITQA action is manual plot. A user can place the stop on the map using the known address, nearby landmarks, or precise coordinates, ensuring an accurate location for routing and analysis.

Automatic correction isn’t reliable here because there’s no trustworthy data to fix, and you’d risk misplacing the stop. A batch update isn’t appropriate for a single ambiguous case and wouldn’t resolve the location issue on its own. Re-running geocoding could work if the underlying data is viable, but with an invalid or missing geocode, it may fail again; manual plotting directly provides a correct, verifiable position.